Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
77/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Epargyreus clarus (silver-spotted skipper) bulk RNA-Seq from HiSeq 4000 with moderate base quality (87.8% ≥Q20, 82.9% ≥Q30) across 35M reads. Suitable for surveying lepidopteran gene expression and comparative transcriptomics, though lower quality may impact rare transcript detection.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0