Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
91/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Swimming crab (Epargyreus clarus) bulk RNA-seq; reliable and recommended for reuse (grade A). Clean profile with zero adapter contamination and solid Q30 content (89.2%) and mean base quality (33.4); modest cDNA duplication (43.16%, scored 71/100) is expected library-complexity variation that does not degrade quantification. All measurements are confirmed, supporting confident gene expression analysis.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0