SRR12572648

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

77/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Borderline-quality bulk RNA-seq from Epargyreus clarus (C grade, 77/100) with Q30 only 83.1% (scored 66/100) and base quality Q 32.1 (scored 68/100), indicating older sequencing chemistry or run-quality degradation. Reuse requires careful filtering and validation; lower-abundance transcripts may be unreliable.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Epargyreus clarus

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2480975677 reported

total reads 31186305 reported

n content pct 0.006 measured

pct q20 bases 88.1 measured

pct q30 bases 83.1 measured

gc content pct 42.3 measured

mean read length 79.6 measured

mean base quality 32.1 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 32.72 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 77/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 83.1 measured ×1 66%

mean base quality 32.1 measured ×0.6 68%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 32.72 measured ×0.4 94%

QC cost 54 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0