Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
58/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
SARS-CoV-2 amplicon, Illumina NovaSeq. Fails QC (F, 58/100) due to catastrophic adapter contamination (20.98%), indicating incomplete primer removal or ligation failures that will generate off-target reads and chimeras. Q30 bases (87.5%) are respectable but cannot rescue a dataset where ~21% of reads carry unwanted sequence; reuse not recommended without aggressive remediation and revalidation.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0