Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read Illumina amplicon of SARS-CoV-2. Grade D: not recommended for reuse. Adapter contamination at 18.92% (scoring 0/100, weight 0.5) remains above acceptable thresholds; high duplication (90.06%) on this 562k-read sample further compromises utility for variant detection.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0