Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Aedes aegypti miRNA-seq on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 is a deep run with 57.5 million short reads (2.87 billion bases) and exceptional quality (99.1% Q20, 97% Q30). The 48.4% GC content aligns with the companion miRNA dataset, confirming consistent preparation. Extremely high read depth enables discovery of rare miRNAs, profiling of their target transcripts, and investigation of condition-specific miRNA expression with exceptional sensitivity.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0