Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
90/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Oxford Nanopore MinION long-read WGS of an activated sludge metagenome produced 547,303 long reads (2.03 billion bases) with reported perfect quality (100% Q20, 100% Q30). The 56% GC content is typical for complex microbial communities. Long reads enable resolution of repetitive genomic regions and recovery of complete microbial genomes from mixed populations; however, assess coverage heterogeneity across species before relying on quantitative metagenomic conclusions.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0