Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Danaus plexippus bulk RNA-seq on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 provided 35.4 million short reads (7.09 billion bases) with excellent quality (98.3% Q20, 95% Q30). The 48.8% GC content is consistent with the other monarch datasets, indicating biological and replicate consistency. High read count and quality support comprehensive gene expression profiling, transcript reconstruction, and detection of lowly-expressed isoforms. Excellent dataset for robust transcriptomics.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0