Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Ladybug (Coccinella septempunctata) bulk RNA-seq; excellent and recommended for reuse (grade A). Zero adapter contamination and exceptional base quality (Q30: 95.1%, mean Q: 36.2) indicate a clean, high-fidelity run; the modest 44% duplication rate (scored 69/100) is expected from cDNA complexity and does not constrain expression analysis. All metrics are measured and confirmed, supporting confident alignment and transcript quantification.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0