Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
57/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
SARS-CoV-2 short-read amplicon. Grade F (fails); evidence provisional. Two converging failures: Q30 at 87.1% (among lowest) combined with adapter content at 20.68%. Lower mean base quality (33.1) and Q20 at 92% indicate this run experienced sequencing degradation. Unsuitable for variant calling without extensive filtering; duplication (85.7%) provides minimal unique evidence.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0