Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
51/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read Illumina amplicon of SARS-CoV-2. Grade F (51/100): only failing sample in batch, not recommended for reuse. Reduced Q30 bases (85.4%, scoring 77/100, weight 1) combined with adapter contamination (19.16%, scoring 0/100) create a compounding quality deficit unsuitable for reliable variant calling.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0