Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
SARS-CoV-2 short-read amplicon sequencing. Grade D QC; evidence is provisional (metrics extrapolated/reported mix, strength=1). Adapter contamination at 23.13% is the primary liability—unremoved sequencing adapters will confound variant calls and mapping. Q30 base quality is excellent (96%), but high duplication (91.82%) typical of amplicon protocols cannot compensate for adapter burden; not recommended without aggressive adapter trimming.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0