Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Melitaea cinxia bulk RNA-seq. Grade A (94/100); suitable for reuse. Near-perfect adapter removal (0.13%) ensures artifact-free mapping. Q30 at 94.3% and mean Q at 34.5 support sensitive expression quantification. Duplication at 46% is expected for RNA-seq and does not impede transcript abundance or isoform analysis.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0