Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Melitaea cinxia bulk RNA-seq. Grade A (95/100); high-quality for reuse. Minimal adapter contamination (0.24%) and excellent base quality (Q30=94%) ensure reads align and quantify reliably. Duplication at 43.86% reflects normal RNA expression depth and does not impede transcript abundance analysis. Suitable for expression profiling and differential expression.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0