Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Melitaea cinxia bulk RNA-seq from a NextSeq 500 generated 5.5 million short reads (848.7 million bases) with good quality (95.7% Q20, 94% Q30). The slightly elevated GC content (43.2%) compared to the companion Melitaea dataset may indicate different tissue types or experimental conditions. Useful for transcript quantification; pair with SRR12808856 for robust multi-replicate transcriptomic analysis with biological depth.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0