Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina NextSeq 500 bulk RNA-seq from Melitaea cinxia comprises 6.1 million short reads totaling 934 million bases at high quality (95.7% ≥Q20, 94% ≥Q30). The 42.1% GC composition and minimal N content indicate clean sequencing suitable for transcript quantification. This moderate-depth RNA-seq dataset enables gene expression profiling and differential expression studies in this butterfly, though the read count is lower than many RNA-seq projects.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0