Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
92/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Melitaea cinxia bulk RNA-seq (Grade A). Excellent base composition (94.4% Q30+) and near-absent adapter contamination (0.11%) support reuse. Moderate duplication (50.61%) is the limiting factor but expected for RNA-seq; acceptable for gene-level analysis though isoform or splice-level sensitivity may be modestly reduced.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0