SRR12809037

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

92/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Melitaea cinxia bulk RNA-seq. Grade A (92/100); suitable for RNA-seq analysis. Excellent adapter removal (0.15%) and strong base quality (Q30=93.9%) support reliable transcript quantification. Duplication at 51.75% is the quality-limiting metric but remains acceptable for RNA-seq; slightly elevated PCR bias should be acknowledged in downstream analysis but does not prohibit reuse.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Melitaea cinxia

Instrument

NextSeq 500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 899082280 reported

total reads 5915015 reported

n content pct 0.007 measured

pct q20 bases 95.8 measured

pct q30 bases 93.9 measured

gc content pct 43.8 measured

mean read length 86 measured

mean base quality 34.4 measured

adapter content pct 0.15 measured

duplication rate pct 51.75 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 92/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93.9 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 34.4 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.15 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 51.75 measured ×0.4 52%

QC cost 44 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0