Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
SARS-CoV-2 short-read amplicon (NextSeq 550). Grade D; evidence provisional. Adapter content at 21.5% is the binding issue. Smaller dataset (270k reads) and Q30 at 94.5% (acceptable but not best) together reduce this run's utility; limited statistical power for rare variants. Adapter removal helps, but depth ceiling limits impact compared to larger runs.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0