Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
57/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
High-coverage (24×) short-read whole-genome sequencing of human DNA on HiSeq 2000; ~150M reads achieve 74.8 Gb of bases suitable for SNP and indel detection. Q30 quality at 67.2% is moderate for Illumina short reads, and ~0.5% N content indicates some sequencing artifact. Appropriate for population genetics, linkage analysis, and diploid variant calling in moderately diverse genomes.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0