SRR1292610

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

75/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Hypsiglena

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 4863280858 reported

total reads 16103579 reported

n content pct 0.004 measured

pct q20 bases 97.4 measured

pct q30 bases 96.6 measured

gc content pct 47.2 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 37.3 measured

adapter content pct 50.2 measured

duplication rate pct 51.41 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 75/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96.6 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 37.3 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 50.2 measured ×0.4 0%

duplication rate pct 51.41 measured ×0.4 52%

QC cost 12 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0