Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This ABI SOLiD WGS dataset (AB 5500xl Genetic Analyzer) covers Escherichia coli at 72× depth using short-read color-space chemistry from 6.7 million reads. Base quality is lower (69.4% ≥Q20, 38.9% ≥Q30) compared to other E. coli SOLiD datasets, reflecting reduced sequencing quality in this run. The moderate coverage and lower quality require conservative variant filtering; this dataset is suitable for high-confidence SNP discovery with stringent quality thresholds.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0