Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This ABI SOLiD WGS dataset (AB 5500 Genetic Analyzer) sequences Escherichia coli at 122× coverage using short-read format from 11.2 million reads. Base quality reaches 76% ≥Q20 and 49.2% ≥Q30 with zero N content, supporting variant discovery. The high coverage compensates for moderate Q30, enabling SNP and small indel detection with appropriate SOLiD-aware variant calling strategies.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0