Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
58/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of E. coli on ABI SOLiD (50 bp reads). Grade F (58/100) with measured Q30 only 61.2% (scores 0/100) and mean base quality 26.8, making this unsuitable for reliable variant calling. Mean coverage is extrapolated (171.6×), not directly measured, and evidence strength is low (0.61); a deep measured QC pass is pending before reuse can be recommended.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0