Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
59/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
AB 5500xl (SOLiD) WGS of *Escherichia coli* yields 14.7M reads with significant 82% Q20 and 60.7% Q30 quality limitations inherent to the platform, requiring compensatory depth and error-tolerant assembly strategies for reference-level bacterial genome reconstruction. Search: *E. coli* WGS, SOLiD sequencing, bacterial genomics.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0