Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This ABI SOLiD whole-genome sequencing dataset (AB 5500xl Genetic Analyzer) achieves 128× coverage of Escherichia coli using color-space chemistry and short-read format. Base quality is moderate (76.6% ≥Q20, 50.3% ≥Q30), but zero N content and high coverage depth support SNP/indel discovery with rigorous filtering. Reusers should account for SOLiD-specific error patterns when performing variant calling or genome assembly.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0