Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
62/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
AB 5500xl (SOLiD) WGS of *Escherichia coli* achieves 12.8M reads with 82.7% Q20 and 58.8% Q30—significant platform-inherent quality limitations requiring elevated sequencing depth and permissive assembly parameters for genome reconstruction. Search: *E. coli* WGS, SOLiD platform, bacterial sequencing.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0