Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
63/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This ABI SOLiD whole-genome sequencing (AB 5500xl) covers Escherichia coli at 131× depth using short-read color-space chemistry across 12.1 million reads. Base quality metrics show improvement over some SOLiD datasets (82.7% ≥Q20, 58.6% ≥Q30) with zero N content, supporting variant detection and resequencing. The high coverage compensates for moderate Q30 values, enabling SNP/indel calling with appropriate quality-aware filtering.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0