Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This ABI SOLiD WGS dataset (AB 5500xl) covers Escherichia coli at 106× depth using short-read format from 9.8 million reads. Base quality is lower in this dataset (70.2% ≥Q20, 42% ≥Q30) compared to other SOLiD samples, though zero N content confirms data integrity. The moderate coverage and quality level require stringent variant filtering; this dataset is suitable for high-confidence SNP discovery but less ideal for sensitive indel calling.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0