Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
59/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome WGS of Escherichia coli using AB 5500xl SOLiD platform, producing 15 million reads at exceptional 172× coverage with moderate quality (60.7% Q30). This high-depth bacterial WGS from a color-space platform enables sensitive variant discovery, though non-standard sequencing chemistry and moderate Q30 require careful analysis.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0