Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Bemisia tabaci (whitefly) bulk RNA-seq from an Illumina HiSeq 2500 comprises 29.7 million short reads (8.9 billion bases) with solid quality metrics (97.6% Q20, 94.1% Q30). The 37.4% GC content is consistent with this insect species' genome composition, supporting transcriptome profiling and quantification of gene expression patterns. Suitable for differential expression analysis and pathway mapping if paired with appropriate biological replicates from the parent study.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0