SRR1299347

SRA first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

56/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

bulk RNA-seq (Nemoria lixaria), Grade F. Q30 at 76% and mean quality 30.8% are among the lowest in the cohort, indicating systematic quality loss or sample degradation. Not recommended for reuse without explicit validation.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Nemoria lixaria

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1914559700 reported

total reads 19145597 reported

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 85.1 measured

pct q30 bases 76 measured

gc content pct 50.1 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 30.8 measured

adapter content pct 0.26 measured

duplication rate pct 33.23 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 56/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 76 measured ×1 30%

mean base quality 30.8 measured ×0.6 47%

adapter content pct 0.26 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 33.23 measured ×0.4 93%

QC cost 25 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0