Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
29/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
PacBio RS II long-read whole-genome sequencing of human DNA generates 163k reads averaging ~9 kb per read, enabling structural variant detection and repetitive-region assembly. Extremely shallow coverage (0.5×) and zero quality metrics at Q20+ limit this dataset to low-depth reference-free assembly and long-read method development. Useful primarily for benchmarking long-read aligners or testing haplotype reconstruction algorithms rather than variant discovery.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0