Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina MiSeq ncRNA-seq from Bombyx mori sequences non-coding RNA (e.g., miRNA, snoRNA) from 3.1 million short reads at exceptional quality (99.4% ≥Q20, 97.1% ≥Q30). The small insert size and conservative total bases (~158 million) reflect ncRNA-specific library enrichment; the 48.8% GC composition and minimal N content support accurate small RNA quantification. This dataset enables discovery of regulatory ncRNAs and their expression profiling in this model insect.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0