← Dataset search
SRR13070670
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
72/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Drosophila littoralis
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
8.48
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
13933267998
reported
total reads
46136649
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
98
measured
pct q30 bases
95.5
measured
pct reads q30
98.6
measured
sampled bases
108277872
measured
sampled reads
717072
measured
gc content pct
43.5
measured
polyg tail pct
0.01
measured
read length sd
0
measured
quality dropoff
-0.2
measured
read length max
151
measured
read length min
151
measured
read length n50
151
measured
max base quality
41
measured
mean read length
151
measured
max n pct per pos
0.036
measured
mean base quality
39.3
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
0
measured
read length median
151
measured
adapter content pct
30.36
measured
median read quality
40.4
measured
duplication rate pct
16.19
measured
overrepresented top pct
0.25
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 72/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
95.5
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
16.19
measured
×0.5
74%
adapter content pct
30.36
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
35 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0