Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
78/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Synthetic metagenome whole-genome sequencing on NovaSeq 6000 produces 39.1M short reads at good quality (Q30 92.4%, 46.6% GC). Known composition makes this dataset valuable for benchmarking metagenomic assembly, binning, and taxonomic profiling pipelines without confounding biological variability. Primary limitation: synthetic nature does not capture real environmental community complexity or strain heterogeneity.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0