Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
86/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq from whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) on HiSeq 2500 (150 bp). Grade B (86/100) with high base quality (Q30 92.4%, mean 38.9) but measured adapter content at 16.59% scores only 19/100, indicating incomplete adapter trimming. All metrics measured; reuse requires careful pre-processing or trimming; the high adapters are the primary reuse concern.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0