Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
55/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NextSeq 550 short-read RNA-seq of Hormaphis cornu (aphid) yielding 12.9 million reads at lower quality (Q30=77.1%) across 3.9 billion bases. While base quality is below optimal, the dataset can address gene expression questions in this hemipteran model, particularly for transcript abundance estimation with appropriate quality filtering and normalization.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0