Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
42/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NextSeq 550 bulk RNA-Seq of Hormaphis cornu aphid with elevated GC content (59.6%) and moderate quality (82.3% Q20) across 14M reads. The dataset enables gene expression profiling in this symbiont-harboring insect but the lower base quality and potentially biased GC composition warrant careful quality filtering for downstream variant or isoform analysis. Useful for establishing baseline transcriptome composition despite moderate sequencing depth.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0