Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
72/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2000 ncRNA-Seq of the silkworm *Bombyx mori* achieves 99.2% Q20 and 98.3% Q30 across 5.5M reads, enabling high-fidelity mapping of non-coding RNAs governing development, metamorphosis, and silk production in this economically important Lepidopteran. Search: *Bombyx mori* ncRNA, silkworm genomics, non-coding RNA.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0