Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
63/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina HiSeq 2000 ncRNA-Seq of Bombyx mori generated 24.5M reads with moderate quality (80.3% Q30) and elevated N-content (0.043%), suggesting early sequencing chemistry effects. Despite quality issues, this silkworm small-RNA dataset enables investigation of regulatory RNAs involved in silk production.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0