Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
78/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq X Ten RNA-seq of the desiccation-tolerant fly *Polypedilum vanderplanki* yields 22.1M reads and 6.68 Gb bases with 98.4% Q20 on a high-throughput platform, enabling comprehensive transcriptome study of anhydrobiosis and stress tolerance mechanisms. Search: *Polypedilum vanderplanki* RNA-seq, desiccation tolerance, chironomid genomics.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0