SRR1422848

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

51/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Salmo salar

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 24897024600 reported

total reads 124485123 reported

n content pct 0.121 measured

pct q20 bases 84 measured

pct q30 bases 74 measured

gc content pct 50.2 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 30.2 measured

adapter content pct 0.2 measured

duplication rate pct 15.61 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 51/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 74 measured ×1 20%

mean base quality 30.2 measured ×0.6 37%

adapter content pct 0.2 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 15.61 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 18 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0