Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR1427161

ENA first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

83/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:opus

This is a small-RNA (miRNA-Seq) library from mouse, sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000, and it earns a solid B (83/100) as a fundamentally sound but caveated dataset. The grade is held up by excellent base quality — 94.7% of bases at Q30 and a mean base quality of 36.1, with essentially zero adapter contamination and negligible N content — meaning the underlying reads are accurate and clean enough for confident miRNA mapping and quantification. The one metric dragging the score down is an 88.67% duplication rate (scored 0/100), which flags heavy read redundancy; for a miRNA library this is partly expected, since a small repertoire of short mature miRNAs is sequenced deeply, but it still caps true library complexity and means the ~2.6M reads represent fewer unique molecules than the raw count suggests — a real limit if you need sensitive detection of low-abundance miRNAs. Note also that the headline counts (total reads/bases, checksum) are reported rather than independently measured and the evidence_strength is 1, so while the per-base quality metrics are genuinely measured, the complexity and yield read should be treated as provisional pending a deeper measured pass.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 132178689 reported
total reads 2591739 reported
n content pct 0.003 measured
pct q20 bases 95.7 measured
pct q30 bases 94.7 measured
gc content pct 51.6 measured
mean read length 51 measured
mean base quality 36.1 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 88.67 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 83/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.7 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 36.1 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 88.67 measured ×0.4 0%
QC cost 21 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 89