Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
57/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
454 GS FLX pyrosequencing of Camellia oleifera RNA yielding 172,391 longer reads totaling 51 million bases with lower base quality (Q30=71.6%). This data reflects mid-throughput long-read technology and is suitable for transcriptome assembly and gene annotation in this oil-bearing plant, though users should apply quality-aware assembly strategies.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0