← Dataset search
SRR14829481
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
9009543400
reported
total reads
44601700
reported
n content pct
0.012
measured
pct q20 bases
96.5
measured
pct q30 bases
89.5
measured
gc content pct
54.5
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
37.3
measured
adapter content pct
1.56
measured
duplication rate pct
35.31
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 97/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
89.5
measured
×1
98%
mean base quality
37.3
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
1.56
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
35.31
measured
×0.4
88%
QC cost
34 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0