← Dataset search
SRR1516199
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
46/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Papio anubis
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
4177405740
reported
total reads
21986346
reported
n content pct
0.254
measured
pct q20 bases
71
measured
pct q30 bases
55.8
measured
gc content pct
40.3
measured
mean read length
95
measured
mean base quality
24.2
measured
adapter content pct
2.05
measured
duplication rate pct
1.38
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 46/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
55.8
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
1.38
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
2.05
measured
×0.4
93%
QC cost
27 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0