Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx RNA-Seq of Sarcophaga bullata flesh fly yielded 32M reads with high quality (93.9% Q30 bases) and lower GC content (39.4%). This relatively large insect transcriptome dataset enables robust comparative transcriptomics and developmentally-staged gene expression profiling, useful for studying dipteran wound-healing or immune responses.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0