← Dataset search
SRR1553516
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
52/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Zaire ebolavirus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
62872500
reported
total reads
311250
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
84.4
measured
pct q30 bases
78
measured
gc content pct
52.5
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
30.9
measured
adapter content pct
6.54
measured
duplication rate pct
45.97
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 52/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
78
measured
×1
40%
mean base quality
30.9
measured
×0.6
48%
adapter content pct
6.54
measured
×0.4
75%
duplication rate pct
45.97
measured
×0.4
65%
QC cost
11 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0