SRR1557148

ENA first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

33/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Penicillium digitatum

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 930800711 reported

total reads 9308892 reported

n content pct 0.023 measured

pct q20 bases 77.2 measured

pct q30 bases 67 measured

gc content pct 53.2 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 27.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 10.7 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 33/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 67 measured ×1 0%

mean base quality 27.9 measured ×0.6 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 10.7 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 27 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0